Multiply Scandal Part 4

fibelsforalden wrote on May 13

how i wish you really know what am i pointing out dear. you know what menard? unang-una hindi mo ko kilala. pangalawa hindi ako tanga para ipangalandakan na ang mga mahihirap e walang kwenta. Okay? so bago ka magcomment eh kilalanin mo muna ako para malaman mo kung bakit ko nasabi ang ganung bagay. I told you dear, you should search for a deeper meaning before posting a blog like this opposing what i had posted.

reply

fibelsforalden wrote on May 13

menardmari said

wow naman ahlai.. hahaha.. ^^ talumpati un ahh..hehe… salamat po sa support.haha.. ^^..tnx tnx tnx..^^ tama tama..^^ yey…dami na kumakampi sakin.. :) cno pa sasangayon sakin?? :)

dear, if you only knew.
hays.
you don’t have to look for someone para lang kampihan ka dahil hindi ako nagbblog para lang kwestyonin o whatever.
ayokong sabihing tanga ka dahil hindi kita kilala.
ayoko rin naman na magcocomment ka sakin ng hindi mo nalalaman ang dahilan. okay?
ayoko ng away dahil tanging mga nakakaalam lamang ang nakakaintindi ng pi-nost ko.
okay?
thanks for your comment anyways..:)

reply

soundandsynergy wrote on May 13, edited on May 13

i would like to lay down my opinion too. I disagree with what you are saying. you are the one who’s not looking at the bigger picture. let’s look at it this way, the “lipunan” that phoebe is talking about is not the same “lipunan” that you are referring to. and secondly, your stand is obviously subjective. your stand is purely a figment of the so called “karapatan” that you believe is still existing. thirdly, crab mentality is so far out. you think you know your country, but think again.

rejzeppelin wrote on May 13

a friend of mine forwarded this link to me and yes to defend phoebe here i go… to make it concise, PAREHO KAYONG TAMA, then again phoebe has the main point here. ever heard of satire? that’s that. however making a statement cloudy and sooner driving the main contention is phoebe’s aim. i know her tol. both of you, yes sensible. it;s just that you didn’t quite get what she was saying. matter of fact your opposite reaction was actually adhering to a positive agreement with hers. Think of it this way, if one says masayang magbilad sa araw dahil nakaka skin cancer, that is really the opposite of it. so dont argue further, she’s right, you are too. HOWEVER, ANG LIPUNANG PINAGHAHARIAN NG MAYAMAN KAYSA NG MAHIHIRAP ANG SIYANG NAGDIKDIKTA NA ANG PAGIGING MARALITA AY ISANG KATUMPAKAN DAHIL SA STRUKTURA NG KULTURA, KUNG KAYAT ITO AY TAMA HANGGAT SA SINASABI NILA. ANUMANG MORALIDAD NA NAGSASABING PANTAY ANG MAHIRAP SA MAYAMAN AY AYON SA BATAS. AT DAHIL DITO ANG PAGIGING ANAK PAWIS AY NAGIGING TAMA.

got that? no. i hope u did get my satirical point.

There are no comments yet. Be the first and leave a response!

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://pinaymama.com/2010/03/multiply-scandal-part-4/trackback/